28.05.2024 | Insight
#EnhertuEmergency: HCPs in the UK call for NHS access to Enhertu for HER2-low breast cancer patients
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published its final draft guidance on Enhertu in March, deciding not to recommend the use of the cancer drug for HER2-low breast cancer on the basis that it is not “a cost-effective use of NHS resources”. Enhertu, jointly developed and commercialised by AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo, is approved in the US for several types of cancer including HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, HER2+ advanced stomach cancer as well as HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.
The decision is reminiscent of NICE’s rejection of Lynparza (Olaparib) for use in metastatic prostate and breast cancer based on cost-effectiveness in September 2022. Seven months later, after scores of healthcare professionals (HCPs) took to X to demand #OlaparibNow, NICE recommended it as a “clinically and cost-effective option”.
NICE’s decision to not recommend Enhertu has also generated a lot of conversation both online and in the media, with major news outlets highlighting the reaction from patients living with incurable breast cancer. But what do HCPs in the UK think about NICE’s recommendation?
HCPs overwhelmingly negative about Enhertu’s rejection in the UK
UK HCPs online are overwhelmingly negative towards the decision to not recommend Enhertu for NHS use in England. 95% of HCP posts about NICE’s rejection expressed anger, frustration and sadness at the decision.
Much of this emotive language comes from patients, whose voices were amplified by HCPs sharing their posts, often adding their own thoughts and experiences. Over half (53%) of the HCP posts about the decision were reposts; HCPs frequently share posts from Breast Cancer Now as well as from breast cancer patients such as teacher Kate Rackham who described the rejection as her “worst nightmare”.
This is my worst nightmare… Knowing that there is a drug that could prolong my life, but being denied access to it. Please, please sign and share. ❤️https://t.co/ZuU0u52Hmv
— Teacher with Cancer (@kate_rackham) March 6, 2024
HCPs also share posts from those who have family members living with breast cancer; a nurse shared one person’s argument that “If the treatment exists it’s wrong to only offer it to certain people!!”.
Please read, share and sign the petition if you can! Help my mum to get the treatment she (and others) deserve. If the treatment exists it’s wrong to only offer it to certain people!! https://t.co/UqDjEOKgP9 https://t.co/LftwkvWWIf
— Rody Chodes (@harrythepratt) March 20, 2024
While patients’ opinions are having a profound impact on the HCP conversation, so too are prominent patient advocacy groups. Two thirds (67%) of all HCP posts advocate for their followers to sign Breast Cancer Now’s petition to make Enhertu available on the NHS.
The petition, which has received a quarter of a million signatures at the time of writing, is often accompanied by the hashtag #EnhertuEmergency. The hashtag was used in over a hundred HCP posts discussing Enhertu in the UK between March and May 2024. This goes some way to show there is considerable agreement between HCPs, patients and patient advocacy groups.
HCPs’ negativity towards NICE’s rejection of Enhertu is consistent across England and Scotland
There is also a broad consensus among HCPs across the UK geographically. While NICE’s rejection only impacts patients in England, HCPs in both England and Scotland express their support for Enhertu’s approval. Robert Hunter, a doctor in Glasgow, posted on X that “patients with terminal breast cancer in England will be denied access to new treatment that has already been approved in Scotland”. Four other HCPs from across the UK discussed “inequities” in breast cancer patients accessing life-extending drugs.
Cancer Treatment: Patients with terminal breast cancer in England will be denied access to new treatment that has already been approved in Scotland. The drug (Enhertu) for advanced breast cancer affects 50% late-stage cases. NICE said the drug didn’t ‘provide value for money’☹️
— Robert Hunter 🇪🇺 (@BobHunterMD) March 5, 2024
This coalition of HCPs from across the UK suggests that NICE’s rejection of Enhertu is not just a point of contention for HCPs in England, but something that HCPs around the UK largely agree on.
Potential challenges for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo
Despite the groundswell of positive opinion towards Enhertu as a treatment option, there are reputational risks for AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo related to NICE’s decision not to recommend Enhertu. While HCPs online generally saw NICE’s recommendation as the main roadblock for patients getting Enhertu on the NHS, there are still concerning signs for its manufacturers.
Almost half of the posts made by UK HCPs (49.6%) tagged AstraZeneca.These posts call for the manufacturer to “sit around the table” with NICE. Similarly, the most-shared post by HCPs called on “@NICEComms, @NHSEngland, @ASTRAZENECAUK and @DaiichiSankyoUK to make the life-extending drug, Enhertu available on the NHS”.
I've joined with @BreastCancerNow to call on @NICEComms, @NHSEngland, @ASTRAZENECAUK and @DaiichiSankyoUK to make the life-extending drug, Enhertu available on the NHS. Will you join me? Sign the petition #EnhertuEmergency https://t.co/21sMDSFeIk
— Sarah Adomah (@saradan26) March 6, 2024
The only post which was positive about Enhertu’s rejection came from a medical oncologist. He suggested it was “crazy the price certain countries pay for drugs”, and that he does not want drugs to be provided “at any price”.
Crazy the price certain countries pay for drugs? Access to cancer drugs is good to very good in the UK. Many things crazy in the world of access to drugs, NICE metrics one of the more sane things IMO. But yes EVP is something I would like for my patients but at any price? No
— Simon C (@scserendipity1) March 8, 2024
While this view is not yet one that is expressed widely among UK HCPs in the online conversation, there is a chance that it will become more prevalent the longer that Enhertu is unavailable to patients living with incurable breast cancer. Changes in HCP attitudes can have a profound impact on market access strategy; by actively tracking the online HCP conversation and conducting early listening you can stay informed and shape your approach accordingly.
Conclusion
Using CREATION Pinpoint, the online conversations of HCPs in the UK on X were collected from March 2024 to May 2024. During this period, 79 HCPs in the UK published 137 posts about the rejection of Enhertu for HER2-low breast cancer. These posts were then analysed for sentiment, to determine what HCPs feel about this development.
By conducting thorough social listening, understanding HCP sentiments online can help guide and inform market access decisions. Within the online HCP conversation in the UK, there is a clear desire for NICE to facilitate access to Enhertu for women living with incurable breast cancer. To find out more about how you can identify and understand HCPs in your market and therapy area, follow CREATION.co on LinkedIn or get in touch for a chat.