29.03.2022 | Insight

Why HCPs want more funding for brain tumour research and treatment

By Paul Cranston

Cancerous tumours in the brain and central nervous system (CNS) is the 10th leading cause of death for men and women worldwide, with an estimated 251,329 people dying from primary cancerous brain and CNS tumours in 2020 according to ASCO’s patient information website. Despite the severity of the condition, there is still only a limited understanding of the direct causes of brain tumours and only a limited range of treatment options available for HCPs to use.

While HCP conversation around brain tumours was active consistently throughout the last 12 months, the volume of discussion surrounding it increased during relevant awareness days and months, as well as during the annual conference of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.
Graph showing awareness events and EANO conference driving HCP conversation

As CREATION.co has previously identified, HCPs regularly engage with disease awareness days in order to draw attention to their specific therapy area, often highlighting the frustrations and difficulties that they and their patients experience. In the brain tumour space, the key concerns that HCPs frequently expressed centred around a lack of pharmaceutical products approved to treat brain cancer, as well as the lack of progress in effective treatment of the disease. 

The Brain Tumour Social Media (#BTSM) chat, which hosts monthly discussions on Twitter on brain tumour related topics, further highlighted this issue – noting how little development there had been in terms of new therapies of the past 40 year period, as well as sharing an image which highlighted HCPs dissatisfaction with the current options available to them.

HCPs want more treatments options

Of the treatment options currently available, temozolomide was the most frequently mentioned therapy by HCPs, and has been shown in clinical trials to improve overall survival for those with malignant brain tumours. HCPs acknowledged that this treatment is currently the best option available, though in some cases due to the presence of a DNA repair gene known as MGMT it can still be ineffective. However, a lack of alternatives often means that HCPs will proceed with temozolomide regardless of the presence of MGMT.

Graph showing FDA approved brain tumour therapies

When mentioning other treatments, Lomustine was frequently highlighted by HCPs for its increasing cost, with the current price being roughly 1,900% than it was 8 years ago; while  bevacizumab was seen to have had disappointing trial results. Together, this demonstrates HCPs frustration with all of the current options available to them and illustrates the need for new treatment options in order to improve the outcomes for brain tumour patients.

HCPs campaign for more research funding

One of the key factors limiting progress in treatment of brain cancers has been the lack of funding for researchers working in the space. Brain tumours are particularly difficult to treat effectively due to the blood-brain barrier, which many typical cancer therapies cannot cross in order to target the cancer. As such, HCPs across various nations have taken to social media in order to try and address this problem, campaigning for additional funding into brain tumour research and treatment. In the US, HCPs joined the National Brain Tumor Society in urging their local political representatives to increase research funding and healthcare access.

In Australia, a neurosurgeon drew attention to the current 100% mortality rate of glioblastoma, the most common type of brain tumour in adults, as evidence that more research into new treatments is needed.

https://twitter.com/sammons_vanessa/status/1477818927979794433

And in the UK, HCPs shared charitable organisations that use donations to fund brain tumour research, as well as petitioning leaders of their government.

HCPs continue working with limited resources

Over the last year, the difficulties already facing HCPs in their efforts to treat brain tumours have been further heightened by the additional burden of COVID-19, meaning that for many patients their treatments had to be delayed. Many HCPs lamented this situation, sharing stories of patients whose surgery had been delayed. 

Nonetheless, HCPs and researchers have continued to persevere in the face of difficult circumstances, using the funding available to them to continue to search for better therapy options to treat brain tumours and ways to increase the survival chances of patients.

The EANO congress offered some great examples of the advancements HCPs and researchers have been making in brain tumour treatment. Some of the highlights included a new DNA damage response biology generating new treatments, in-depth explorations of the blood brain barrier, and presentations on the clinical implications of genetic scars induced by radiotherapy.

Throughout the last year, HCPs have used social media as a tool to amplify their concerns around brain tumour research and treatment, calling for increased investment into exploring new and improved therapy options to be able to offer patients. Additionally, social media offered an opportunity for HCPs to share the progress that was being made, and celebrate those contributing to brain tumour research.

If you are interested in finding out more about the needs of HCP communities within a specific therapy area, you can register for CREATION’s monthly knowledge e-journal, or get in touch with us directly to see how we can support your work.

View all articles >

Meet the Author

Paul Cranston

Suggested next


09.03.2021 | Article

Predictive insights for market access strategy from HCP views

Understanding the evolving views of healthcare professionals before product launch

By Daniel Ghinn

09.06.2021 | Article

What do HCPs think about antidepressant use for clinical depression?

In observing the negative sentiments, we see that HCPs have expressed that the primary...

By Jennifer Ayoade

View all articles >